嶺東科技大學 |

[NT 42591] Language: 簡体中文

[NT 5635] Back

[NT 59884] Switch To: [NT 5556] Labeled | [NT 5559] MARC Mode | [NT 33762] ISBD

Hume's radical scepticism and the fate of naturalized epistemology

[NT 42944] Record Type:	[NT 8598] Electronic resources : [NT 40817] monographic
[NT 47261] Author:	MeekerKevin, 1968-
[NT 47351] Place of Publication:	Basingstoke
[NT 47263] Published:	Palgrave Macmillan;
[NT 47352] Year of Publication:	2013
[NT 47264] Description:	1 online resource.
[NT 47298] Series:	Palgrave innovations in philosophy
[NT 47266] Subject:	Knowledge, Theory of - History - 18th century. -
[NT 47266] Subject:	Skepticism - History. -
[NT 47266] Subject:	PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology -
[NT 51399] Personal Subject:	Hume - David -
[NT 51458] Online resource:	http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137025555
[NT 47265] Notes:	Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed.
[NT 51398] Summary:	Was David Hume radically sceptical about our attempts to understand the world or was he merely approaching philosophical problems from a scientific perspective? Most philosophers today believe that Hume's outlook was more scientific than radically sceptical and that his scepticism was more limited than previously supposed. If these philosophers are correct, then Hume's approach to philosophy mirrors the approach of many contemporary philosophers. This similarity between Hume and many aspects of contemporary philosophy suggests that we should try to understand Hume not as an historical relic but as a partner in a continuing philosophical dialogue. When we look closely at Hume's thoughts about human understanding, we find that Hume's scepticism emerges very insistently in the context of Hume's scientific approach. This book tries to come to terms with Hume's scepticism in a way that sheds light on contemporary philosophy and its relationship to science.
[NT 50961] ISBN:	9781137025555electronic bk.
[NT 50961] ISBN:	1137025557electronic bk.
[NT 60779] Content Note:	1. A Tale of Two Interpretations 2. Fallibility Gains a Foothold: A Model for Understanding Humean Scepticism 3. Fallibility's Ultimate Epistemic Consequence 4. Belief without Evidence 5. Endorsing Epistemic Egalitarianism 6. Scepticism and the 'Nature' of Naturalized Epistemology 7. Hume's Naturalistic Internalism 8. Philosophy after Scepticism.

Hume's radical scepticism and the fate of naturalized epistemology
Meeker, Kevin

Hume's radical scepticism and the fate of naturalized epistemology / Kevin Meeker. - Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. - 1 online resource.. - (Palgrave innovations in philosophy).
1. A Tale of Two Interpretations.
Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed..
Includes bibliographical references and index..
ISBN 9781137025555ISBN 1137025557
Knowledge, Theory ofSkepticismPHILOSOPHY / Epistemology -- History -- History. -- 18th century.

Hume's radical scepticism and the fate of naturalized epistemology
LDR:02269clm 2200289 4500 001 282197
005 20130621115240.0
009 ocn844076952
010 1 $a 9781137025555 $b electronic bk.
010 1 $a 1137025557 $b electronic bk.
100 $a 20140528
101 0 $a eng
102 $a gb
135 $a v
200 1 $a Hume's radical scepticism and the fate of naturalized epistemology $f Kevin Meeker.
204 1 $a electronic resource
210 $a Basingstoke $d 2013 $c Palgrave Macmillan
215 1 $a 1 online resource.
225 1 $a Palgrave innovations in philosophy
300 $a Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed.
320 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
327 1 $a 1. A Tale of Two Interpretations $a 2. Fallibility Gains a Foothold: A Model for Understanding Humean Scepticism $a 3. Fallibility's Ultimate Epistemic Consequence $a 4. Belief without Evidence $a 5. Endorsing Epistemic Egalitarianism $a 6. Scepticism and the 'Nature' of Naturalized Epistemology $a 7. Hume's Naturalistic Internalism $a 8. Philosophy after Scepticism.
330 $a Was David Hume radically sceptical about our attempts to understand the world or was he merely approaching philosophical problems from a scientific perspective? Most philosophers today believe that Hume's outlook was more scientific than radically sceptical and that his scepticism was more limited than previously supposed. If these philosophers are correct, then Hume's approach to philosophy mirrors the approach of many contemporary philosophers. This similarity between Hume and many aspects of contemporary philosophy suggests that we should try to understand Hume not as an historical relic but as a partner in a continuing philosophical dialogue. When we look closely at Hume's thoughts about human understanding, we find that Hume's scepticism emerges very insistently in the context of Hume's scientific approach. This book tries to come to terms with Hume's scepticism in a way that sheds light on contemporary philosophy and its relationship to science.
410 0 $a Palgrave innovations in philosophy.
600 1 $a Hume $b David $f 1711-1776. $3 311473
606 $a Knowledge, Theory of $x History $z 18th century. $3 311474
606 $a Skepticism $x History. $3 311475
606 $a PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology $2 bisacsh $3 309563
676 $v 23 $a 121
680 $a B2799.K7 $b M44 2013
700 1 $a Meeker $b Kevin $f 1968- $3 311472
801 0 $a tw $b ltu
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137025555