嶺東科技大學 |

[NT 42591] Language: 簡体中文

[NT 5638] Help

[NT 5480] Login

[NT 59466] Create an account

[NT 5635] Back

[NT 59884] Switch To: [NT 5556] Labeled | [NT 5559] MARC Mode | [NT 33762] ISBD

Synthesizing evidence from narrative...

Jordan, Zoe

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion

[NT 42944] Record Type:	[NT 8598] Electronic resources : [NT 40817] monographic
[NT 47261] Author:	JordanZoe,
[NT 47353] Alternative Intellectual Responsibility:	KonnoRie,
[NT 47353] Alternative Intellectual Responsibility:	MuPei Fan,
[NT 47351] Place of Publication:	Philadelphia, Pa.
[NT 47263] Published:	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
[NT 47352] Year of Publication:	2011
[NT 50960] Edition:	1st ed
[NT 47264] Description:	1 online resource (63 p.)
[NT 47266] Subject:	Electronic books -
[NT 47266] Subject:	Evidence -
[NT 47266] Subject:	Decision Making -
[NT 47266] Subject:	Evidence-Based Practice -
[NT 51458] Online resource:	http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=booktext&D=books&AN=01607888/1st_Edition&XPATH=/PG(0)
[NT 47265] Notes:	Description based on print version record
[NT 51398] Summary:	While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilizing it in their practice?
[NT 60779] Content Note:	Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence The systematic review of narrative, expert opinion and text: Protocol development ; Searching for the evidence ; Appraising the evidence ; Synthesizing the evidence

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion
Jordan, Zoe

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion / Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu - 1st ed. - Philadelphia, Pa. : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011. - 1 online resource (63 p.).
Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence.
Description based on print version record.
Includes bibliographical references.
Electronic booksEvidenceDecision MakingEvidence-Based Practice

Konno, Rie

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion
LDR:01894clm 2200265 4500 001 286059
009 ocn774694984
010 1 $z 1451163851
010 1 $z 9781451163858
100 $a 20140528d2011 k y0engy01 b
101 0 $a eng
102 $a us $b pa
105 $a y a 000yy
200 1 $a Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion $f Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu
204 1 $a electronic resource
205 $a 1st ed
210 $a Philadelphia, Pa. $d 2011 $c Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
215 1 $a 1 online resource (63 p.)
300 $a Description based on print version record
320 $a Includes bibliographical references
327 1 $a Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence $a The systematic review of narrative, expert opinion and text: Protocol development ; Searching for the evidence ; Appraising the evidence ; Synthesizing the evidence
330 $a While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilizing it in their practice?
606 $a Electronic books $2 lc $3 321766
606 $a Evidence $3 301517
606 $a Decision Making $2 mesh $3 323045
606 $a Evidence-Based Practice $2 mesh $3 323046
676 $a 121/.65
680 $a BC173 $b J67 2011
686 $a WB 102.5 $b J825s 2011
700 1 $a Jordan $b Zoe $3 323042
701 1 $a Konno $b Rie $3 323043
701 1 $a Mu $b Pei Fan $3 323044
856 4 0 $u http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=booktext&D=books&AN=01607888/1st_Edition&XPATH=/PG(0)